Peru-Provisional Antidumping Duties on Vegetable Oils from Argentina
14/12/2007 12:00
Short title: Peru-Vegetable Oils
Complainant: Argentina
Respondent: Peru
Request for Consultations received: 21 October 2002
Summary up-to-date at 5 January 2007
Consultations requested — no panel established nor settlement notified
Complaint by Argentina.
On 21 October 2002, Argentina requested consultations with Peru on its anti-dumping investigation on imports of sunflower and soja vegetable oils and their mixtures originating in Argentina (Resolution No. 016-2002-CDS-INDECOPI); and its imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on those imports as a result of the said investigation (Resolution No. 040-2002-CDS-INDECOPI). Argentina considered that both the on-going investigation and the provisional determination of the existence of dumping, injury and causal link which led to the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties, are inconsistent with Peru’s obligations under Articles 5.2, 5.3, 5.8, 4.1(ii), 6.8 and Annex II, 2.2, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 7, 12.2.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement and Article VI of the GATT 1994.
As regards the measure imposing provisional anti-dumping duties, Argentina considered that it is also inconsistent with Peru’s obligations under Articles 5.2, 5.3, 5.8, 6.8 and Annex II, 2.2, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 7, 12.2.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement and Article VI of the GATT 1994.
Complainant: Argentina
Respondent: Peru
Request for Consultations received: 21 October 2002
Summary up-to-date at 5 January 2007
Consultations requested — no panel established nor settlement notified
Complaint by Argentina.
On 21 October 2002, Argentina requested consultations with Peru on its anti-dumping investigation on imports of sunflower and soja vegetable oils and their mixtures originating in Argentina (Resolution No. 016-2002-CDS-INDECOPI); and its imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on those imports as a result of the said investigation (Resolution No. 040-2002-CDS-INDECOPI). Argentina considered that both the on-going investigation and the provisional determination of the existence of dumping, injury and causal link which led to the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties, are inconsistent with Peru’s obligations under Articles 5.2, 5.3, 5.8, 4.1(ii), 6.8 and Annex II, 2.2, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 7, 12.2.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement and Article VI of the GATT 1994.
As regards the measure imposing provisional anti-dumping duties, Argentina considered that it is also inconsistent with Peru’s obligations under Articles 5.2, 5.3, 5.8, 6.8 and Annex II, 2.2, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 7, 12.2.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement and Article VI of the GATT 1994.
Các tin khác
- Dispute Settlement DS616: European Union — Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties on Stainless Steel Products from Indonesia (24/01/2023)
- Dispute Settlement DS606: European Union — Provisional Anti-Dumping Duty on Mono-Ethylene Glycol from Saudi Arabia (17/08/2021)
- Dispute Settlement DS605: Dominican Republic — Anti-dumping Measures on Corrugated Steel Bars (23/07/2021)
- Dispute Settlement DS603: Australia — Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Products from China (24/06/2021)
- Dispute Settlement DS602: China — Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures on Wine from Australia (22/06/2021)