Dispute Settlement DS436

21/05/2013 12:00 - 855 Views

United States — Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India

Short title: US — Carbon Steel (India)
Complainant: India
Respondent: United States
Third Parties: Australia; Canada; China; European Union; Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of; Turkey
Agreements cited:
(as cited in request for consultations)
GATT 1994: Art. IVI
Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Art. 121011121314151921,2232
Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization: Art. XVI:4
Request for Consultationsreceived: 24 April 2012

 

Consultations

Complaint by India.

On 24 April 2012, India requested consultations with the United States with regard to the imposition of countervailing duties by the United States on certain hot rolled carbon steel flat products from India (“subject goods”).

India challenges countervailing duties levied on those products through various instruments, as well as provisions of the US Tariff Act and Code of Federal Regulations on customs duties. India claims that the countervailing duty investigation and related measures are inconsistent with Articles I and VI of the GATT 1994 and with Articles 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21 and 22 of the SCM Agreement. India also claims that the challenged provisions of US Law are inconsistent “as such” with Articles 12, 14, 15, 19 and 32 of the SCM Agreement.

On 7 May 2012, Canada requested to join the consultations.

On 12 July 2012, India requested the establishment of a panel.  At its meeting on 23 July 2012, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 31 August 2012, the DSB established a panel.  Australia, Canada, China, the European Union, Saudi Arabia and Turkey reserved their third-party rights. On 7 February 2013, India requested the Director-General to determine the composition of the panel.  On 18 February 2013, the Director-General composed the panel.

 

Quảng cáo sản phẩm