European Communities-Antidumping Investigations Regarding Unbleached Cotton Fabrics from India
14/12/2007 12:00
Short title: European Communities-Cotton Fabrics
Complainant: India
Respondent: European Communities
Request for Consultations received: 3 August 1998
Summary up-to-date at 5 January 2007
Consultations requested — no panel established nor settlement notified
Complaint by India.
On 3 August 1998, India requested consultations with the EC in respect of alleged repeated recourse by the EC to anti-dumping investigations on unbleached cotton fabrics (UCF), from India. India considered, in the light of the information which had become available before and after the adoption of Regulation 773/98, that:
o the determination of standing, the initiation, the selection of the sample, the determination of dumping and the injury are inconsistent with the EC’s WTO obligations;
* the establishment by the EC of the facts was not proper and that the EC’s evaluation of facts was not unbiased and objective; and
* the EC has not taken into account the special situation of India as a developing country.
India alleged violations of Articles 2.2.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.6, 3.3, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 4.1(I), 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 6.10, 7.1(I), 7.4, 9.1, 9.2, 12.1, 12.2 and 15 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, and Articles I and VI of GATT 1994. India also alleged nullification and impairment of benefits accruing to it under the cited agreements.
Complainant: India
Respondent: European Communities
Request for Consultations received: 3 August 1998
Summary up-to-date at 5 January 2007
Consultations requested — no panel established nor settlement notified
Complaint by India.
On 3 August 1998, India requested consultations with the EC in respect of alleged repeated recourse by the EC to anti-dumping investigations on unbleached cotton fabrics (UCF), from India. India considered, in the light of the information which had become available before and after the adoption of Regulation 773/98, that:
o the determination of standing, the initiation, the selection of the sample, the determination of dumping and the injury are inconsistent with the EC’s WTO obligations;
* the establishment by the EC of the facts was not proper and that the EC’s evaluation of facts was not unbiased and objective; and
* the EC has not taken into account the special situation of India as a developing country.
India alleged violations of Articles 2.2.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.6, 3.3, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 4.1(I), 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 6.10, 7.1(I), 7.4, 9.1, 9.2, 12.1, 12.2 and 15 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, and Articles I and VI of GATT 1994. India also alleged nullification and impairment of benefits accruing to it under the cited agreements.
Các tin khác
- Dispute Settlement DS616: European Union — Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties on Stainless Steel Products from Indonesia (24/01/2023)
- Dispute Settlement DS606: European Union — Provisional Anti-Dumping Duty on Mono-Ethylene Glycol from Saudi Arabia (17/08/2021)
- Dispute Settlement DS605: Dominican Republic — Anti-dumping Measures on Corrugated Steel Bars (23/07/2021)
- Dispute Settlement DS603: Australia — Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Products from China (24/06/2021)
- Dispute Settlement DS602: China — Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures on Wine from Australia (22/06/2021)