Dispute Settlement DS444

22/05/2013 12:00 - 963 Views

Argentina — Measures Affecting the Importation of Goods

Panel established, but not yet composed on 28 January 2013

Key facts 

Short title:  
Complainant: United States
Respondent: Argentina
Third Parties:

Australia; Canada; China; Ecuador;

European Union; Guatemala; India; Israel;

Japan; Korea, Republic of; Norway;

Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of; Switzerland; Chinese Taipei; Thailand; Turkey; United States

Agreements cited:
(as cited in request for consultations)

GATT 1994:

Art. III:4X:1X:2X:3(a)XI:1
Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs):

Art. 2
Import Licensing: Art. 1.21.31.43.2,3.33.43.55.1

5.25.35.4
Safeguards: Art. 11

Request for Consultationsreceived: 21 August 2012

 

Summary of the dispute to date 

The summary below was up-to-date at 13 March 2013

Consultations

Complaint by the United States. (See also DS438DS445 and DS446)

On 21 August 2012, the United States requested consultations with Argentina concerning certain measures imposed by Argentina on the importation of goods.

The United States challenges: (i) the requirement to present for approval of a non-automatic import licence: Declaración Jurada Anticipada de Importación (DJAI); (ii) non-automatic licences required in the form of Certificados de Importación (CIs) for the importation of certain goods; (iii) requirements imposed on importers to undertake certain trade-restrictive commitments; and (iv) the alleged systematic delay in granting import approval or refusal to grant such approval, or the grant of import approval subject to importers undertaking to comply with certain allegedly trade-restrictive commitments.  

The United States claims that the challenged measures appear to be inconsistent with:

  • Articles III:4, X:1, X:2, X:3(a) and XI:1 of the GATT 1994;
  • Article 2 of the TRIMs Agreement; 
  • Articles 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 of the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures; and
  • Article 11 of the Safeguards Agreement.

On 24 August 2012, Mexico requested to join the consultations.  On 29 August 2102, Turkey requested to join the consultations.  On 30 August 2012, the European Union and Guatemala requested to join the consultations.  On 31 August 2012, Australia, Canada and Japan requested to join the consultations. Subsequently, Argentina informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of Australia, Canada, the European Union, Guatemala, Japan, Mexico and Turkey to join the consultations. On 6 December 2012, the United States requested the establishment of a panel.  At its meeting on 17 December 2012, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 28 January 2013, the DSB established a single panel pursuant to Article 9.1 of the DSU to examine this dispute, DS438 and DS445. Australia, Canada, China, Ecuador, the European Union, Guatemala, India, Japan, Korea, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Chinese Taipei, Thailand and Turkey reserved their third party rights.

 

Quảng cáo sản phẩm